Search for: "State v. Burns"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2024, 7:04 am
Perhaps Judge Daniel feels a little burned by past SAD Scheme plaintiff gamesmanship? [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:59 pm
The United States Forest Service granted a timber permit for doing just that way up in the Idaho panhandle -- that strip of land way up north near Canada. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:04 am
Lokai Holdings LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 10:09 am
Nance v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 7:08 am
Here is the opinion in Ohlsen v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
That's Burns v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
In Munim Abdul and Others v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 247 (Admin) the High Court ruled that prosecution of a group of people who had shouted slogans, including, “burn in hell”, “baby killers” and “rapists” at a parade of British soldiers, was not a breach of their right to freedom of expression, protected by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
In Irizarry v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:51 am
., LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 12:40 pm
Lozeau (Child Custody; Ex Parte Interviews; Mediation) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2025.html Pateras v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:24 pm
The post SCOTUS Update: Glossip v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:42 am
Citing extensively to Brae Burn, Inc v Bloomfield Hills, 350 Mich 425, 430-431; 86 NW2d 166 (1957), the Court held that an ordinance is not invalid just because it bars the most profitable land use. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 9:45 am
Crops and land aren't the same.Here's my analogy (not Justice Robie's): If your house burns down, you can use the insurance money to replace it (without taxation) with another house. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:11 pm
” (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
