Search for: "State v. C. J. A."
Results 501 - 520
of 6,534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2009, 9:02 pm
Accordingly she had a duty under paragraph 4(j) (ii) and (iii) of the Code to explore that policy further. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
Millar(1972), 1972 CanLII 950 (BC SC), 33 D.L.R. (3d) 288 (B.C.S.C.), Berger J. stated, at p. 314: A classical theory that once was unchallengeable must yield to the facts of modern life. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Valleriani, J.], entered June 22, 2022) to review a determination of respondent New York State Division of Human Rights. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Valleriani, J.], entered June 22, 2022) to review a determination of respondent New York State Division of Human Rights. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm
In Nori Holdings v Bank Otkritie [2018] EWHC 1343 (Comm), Males J critically discussed (and openly disagreed with) AG Wathelet’s Opinion on Case C-536/13 Gazprom and confirmed that such injunctions continue to not be available where they would restrain proceedings in another EU Member State. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
In Reklos v Greece ([2009] ECHR 200). the Court stated that while the right to control the use of one’s image generally involves the possibility of refusing publication, “it also covers the individual’s right to object to the recording, conservation and reproduction” of that image. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Dennis J. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm
Just out: Helen J. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:07 am
RUTH C. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 7:40 am
ALITO, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:05 pm
SCOTUS cert grant in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 10-98 (Kagan, J., recused). [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa Co., supra (Opala, J., dissenting) (emphasis in original).Gerhart v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 am
It declined to follow Mitting J in SS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (SC/56/2009, 30 July 2010) that the observations in KJ were per incuriam. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 9:34 am
A notice on subscription-only service Lawtel drew the IPKat's attention to C & J Clark International Ltd v Four Star Distribution, a ruling by Appointed Person Ruth Annand on 20 December 2006 against a UK Trade Mark Registry decision.Four Star applied for invalidation of Clark's CICA trade marks for footwear in Class 25, citing a likelihood of confusion with its own earlier CIRCA registered trade mark for clothing in Class 25. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:06 am
July 15, 2022) (Jacobs, J.), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit declined to impose “scheme liability” under subsections (a) and (c) of the Securities & Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
Rosenstengel, Chief Justice of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, partially denied and partially granted Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in The Premcor Refining Group Inc., v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 4:15 am
Trading Technologies Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., No. 04 C 5312, 2007 WL 2566291 (N.D. [read post]
