Search for: "State v. CC"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2013, 11:07 am
Doe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 11:07 am
Doe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:21 am
In DirecTV v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:38 am
In 2012’s State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 9:29 am
It contains an attachment named `CC Basic Form 06092004.doc. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:02 am
” The US Supreme Court opined about the lack of jury diversity as early as 1940 in Smith v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:42 am
In Wilde v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be… [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:41 am
I hear on the grapevine that the UKSC will be looking at this question shortly in Samin v Westminster CC and Mirga v SSWP. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
In Mobil Cerro Negro, Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 7:18 am
(Jacobsen v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:55 am
Tubbs then testified that prior to the sale of the facility to CCS, Mr. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:16 pm
Mallet had been fired by CCS. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
The restricted case material was inserted into the 1996 Act (finally) by section 314, Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, in order to deal with the declaration of incompatibility found in R(Morris) v Westminster CC [2006] 1 WLR 505 on the previous provision (disregard of applicant's ineligible child for Part VII). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
The restricted case material was inserted into the 1996 Act (finally) by section 314, Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, in order to deal with the declaration of incompatibility found in R(Morris) v Westminster CC [2006] 1 WLR 505 on the previous provision (disregard of applicant's ineligible child for Part VII). [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 1:30 pm
Fortunately, the recent case of Rancho Mirage Country Club HOA v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:16 am
Comm. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 2:01 pm
The defendant in Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:55 am
Photo credit: Marcin Wichary via Foter.com / CC BY [read post]
