Search for: "State v. Christie" Results 501 - 520 of 974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Dutch Minister and EPO immunity | CJEU and droit de suite in Case C-41/14 Christie's France | Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others | Pangyrus Ltd v OHIM, RSVP Design Ltd | China and smartphone patents | UK against groundless threats to sue for IP infringement | Polar bears | Patent needs strictness, complexity and fuzziness. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
At ESPN, Ryan Rodenberg reports on Monday’s argument in Christie v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 11:23 am by Tom Lamb
Merck Fosamax trial, which started back on March 5, was given their "jury charge" by New Jersey state court Judge Carol Higbee, and we expect a jury verdict to be rendered later this week. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:19 pm by David Lat
Chris Christie: Governor Christie, the former U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:01 am by Ronald Collins
Forsythe, Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:04 pm by John W. Arden
Supreme Court's ruling, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc, v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm by Jillian Stonecipher
Texas State Representative Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi, has proposed a "retraction statute" that, if passed, will protect journalists both online and offline and promote truth and efficiency both in and out of court. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Note the headline assertion that British business is failing to protect innovation, then read on, says Jeremy.* Dutch Minister trumps Court of Appeal ruling, reasserts EPO immunityFollowing to the last events of the battle over the European Patent Office's governance, the Dutch Minister of Justice intervened with regard to the EPO's immunity from execution of court orders under international law, Merpel recounts.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that Member States are free to determine… [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
This one may take you a little while to get through, but it's worth it: United States v. [read post]