Search for: "State v. Clara" Results 501 - 520 of 881
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
United States Binance has filed a lawsuit in the state of New Jersey against Forbes Media and two of its journalists, alleging that an article published under the title “Leaked ‘Tai Chi’ Document Reveals Binance’s Elaborate Scheme To Evade Bitcoin Regulators” was defamatory. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 956, the court addressed the use of an exemption (Public Resources Code section 21080(b)(8)) for rate setting for groundwater extraction charges. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Santa Clara, 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 (2011), because the approval was merely “a process for completing the Plan” and the 2012 MOU explicitly stated that “the County retain[ed] full discretion to consider the Final EIR and then to approve the Project, disapprove it, or require additional mitigation measures or alternatives. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:20 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
11:00a-12:00p IGRA at 25 and a Discussion of the Michigan v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:30 am
Earlier this year, the news media reported about several jurisdictions that were having problems with breath testing: Santa Clara, California: More than 858 DUI cases were reviewed by prosecutors after the state learned that the Alco-Sensor V device used by police in several California cities was giving incorrect readings because of a manufacturing defect that allowed condensation to build in the tube. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:45 am
If that is the case, then the Hawai'i Constitution neither permits legislation favoring entities and legislation discriminating against entities.This latter principle actually began in a piece of dictum from Santa Clara County v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:35 pm by Cody M. Poplin
” The New York Times reports that the Supreme Court heard arguments in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
Malice for the purpose of showing an abuse of the qualified privilege only requires showing of a state of mind arising from hatred or ill will evidencing a willingness “to vex, harass, annoy or injure. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
  According to reports, the jury award ranks as the third largest ever in a patent case beating out the Apple v Samsung jury award last summer (see this post by Merpel as reproduced in LegalWeek). [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by NCC Staff
The lawsuits stem from Trump sanctuary cities policies that started with an executive order in January that was later enjoined in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]