Search for: "State v. D. A. R."
Results 501 - 520
of 16,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2008, 9:35 am
R. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:51 pm
On July 18, Representatives Luetkemeyer (R-MO) and Baca (D-CA) introduced H.R. 6139, a bill that would create a national charter for qualified non-depository creditors, to be known as National Consumer Credit Corporations (NCCCs). [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:01 am
At the end of yesterday's hearing in Tafas/SmithKlineBeecham v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:01 am
Here are the briefs in the Court of Appeals: Brief for the New York State Urban Development Corporation d/b/a Empire State Development Corporation Brief for the Petitioners-Respondents (the property owners) Brief amicus curiae of NY State Senator Bill Perkins (Sen. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:18 am
In a recent decision (US v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Cunningham, "Abortion" in the Founding Era: A Reply to Methodological Critiques of Miller & Bacallao, Justice Alito's Question, (Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming).Cass R. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm
Three events boosted our economic turnaround in the 1980's: the passage of Bayh-Dole, which injected the incentives of patent ownership into the federal R&D system; the enactment of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which insured the courts would apply the patent law consistently; and the Supreme Court's ruling in Diamond v Chakraberty that living organisms could be patented. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:38 am
Calhoun, Jason R. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:13 pm
Addison v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:59 am
Traditionally, this has been the role of the patent system, but increasingly, claims are made that this focusses R&D efforts in the direction of greatest profits, rather than towards those areas of greatest public need. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:30 pm
In Mendez v May, 2015 WL 143965 (D. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 11:21 am
R. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:58 am
Regina (Shoesmith) v OFSTED and others [2011] EWCA Civ 642; [2011] WLR (D) 184 “The report of Ofsted into child safeguarding arrangements within a local authority, requested by the Secretary of State for Education following the death of a child while on the authority’s child protection register, was properly and fairly carried out under the statutory requirements of section 20 of the Children Act 2004. [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:12 am
Panter v Rowellian Football Social Club and others [2011] EWHC 1301 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 170 “Paragraph 111(1A)(c) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986, as inserted, applied to companies which were incorporated in states outside the European Economic Area and it did not apply to entities that were not incorporated at all. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:01 am
Alstom Transport v Eurostar International Ltd [2012] EWHC 28 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 4 “Regulation 3(2) of the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2006 (‘UCR’) should be construed as if it said that network ‘includes a system operated in accordance’ instead of ‘means a system operated in accordance’. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:50 am
FKI Engineering Ltd and another v Stribog Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 622; [2011] WLR (D) 178 “Where unrelated actions in different member states of the European Union subsequently became related by virtue of the amendment of the earlier action to include an issue related to the later action, the court seised of the later action had a discretion to stay that action on the grounds that it was no longer the court first seised for the purposes of article 28(1) of Council… [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:12 pm
Colombia and Costa Rica v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 8:45 am
In its brief, the United States acknowledges that the Fourth Circuit’s decision in the case rested on an erroneous interpretation of Section 825.220(d) and that the decision conflicts with a decision of the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
