Search for: "State v. Davis"
Results 501 - 520
of 5,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2007, 3:36 am
The article also stated: In an appellate brief in Greenberg II, Norman Davis suggested that the 2nd Circuit's rulings in other National Geographic cases "set up a conflict" with 11th Circuit Judge Stanley F. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm
.' This appeal presents the question of whether this restriction is race-based and violates the Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:53 am
That's a long time for a case to work its way through the state and federal systems. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 6:10 pm
In a recent decision, Davis v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June ruling in Moore v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 12:55 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
The Court extended that Amendment, and with it, the exclusionary rule, to state and local governments in the 1961 case of Mapp v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:25 am
A recent case from the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, which is styled, Davis v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 10:26 pm
Eugene Volokh has this post at the Volokh Conspiracy highlighting the recent case of State v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:00 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:17 am
The post Putin v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 5:06 am
Davis to determine when a Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion should be treated as a second request for habeas corpus. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:04 am
Paul Davis Restoration, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
The panel was right -- a Ninth Circuit case from 2012 had involved the identical issue, and has expressly so held.But Judge Berzon concurred, stating that although she agreed that circuit precedent dictated the result, the prior panel had gotten the issue wrong, and urged that the case be taken en banc. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
Davis 7. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm
King on exigent circumstances, Davis v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 7:26 am
This week, in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:02 am
See United States v. [read post]
