Search for: "State v. Dively" Results 501 - 520 of 980
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2019, 5:29 am
  It was only too bad that the event was not held after the latest decision of Mr Justice Carr in the TQ Delta v Zyxel saga was published. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 7:23 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
(concurring), at paras. 100-101; Benhaim v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:00 am by Howard Bashman
It’s not everyday that a federal criminal prosecution is argued in a state court of last resort: On Monday, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 1:28 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, No. 17-778 dives again into what is "burglary" for sentencing recidivist criminals, given the varying definitions under which a defendant may have been convicted of a prior burglary in state court. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
On this week’s National Security Law Podcast, Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck closed out 2018 with a deep dive into the state secrets privilege: Zach ZhenHe Tan surveyed the impact of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jesner v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Caroline Lee
Hartinger and Wilson also provided a checklist for a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and MOU audit, then led a discussion about related FLSA issues, including real-world examples from Flores v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:12 am by Allan Blutstein
Here, Judge Mehta, has really done a deeper dive. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, and Culbertson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
That may fall within exception (a).More likely, you'll need to do a deep dive on exception (b), which often applies when an employee has little connection to the forum State. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 3:46 am by Peter Mahler
 Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 4, 2018]. [read post]