Search for: "State v. Dixon"
Results 501 - 520
of 628
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
The procedural safeguards available to the individual will be especially material in determining whether the respondent State has, when fixing the regulatory framework, remained within its margin of appreciation. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:06 am
In Gill v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:41 pm
” In Joshua Wayne Andrews v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 5th District.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Mandatory minimum -- Armed Career Criminal Act -- Predicate convictions -- Prior felony possession of short-barreled shotgun was not violent felony under ACCA -- District court properly declined to sentence defendant under ACCAUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:35 am
State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:53 am
Signature Flight Support Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:56 am
Former ADO Jocilyn Oyler won in State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
This judgment sets the clock back to the days of Dixon of Dock Green. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
Newman, Hayes & Dixon Ins. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:35 pm
Specifically, in appointing the Special Master, the New Jersey Supreme Court ordered a review of the legal standard for the admissibility of eyewitness testimony known as the “Manson test,” established by the United States Supreme Court in 1977 and fully embraced by 48 out of 50 states, including New Jersey in 1988 in State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:35 am
Henry v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 7:06 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
The other day I talked about the decision in Holland v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:46 pm
Dixon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 4:10 am
In Dixon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:56 pm
Dixon, 551 F.3d 578, 582 (C.A.7 2008) (case below); United States v. [read post]
