Search for: "State v. Freedom of Information Commission"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2015, 1:02 pm
Federal Communications Commission. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Šulce, acting as Agents,– the European Commission, by D. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am
But it might nevertheless have a great impact: Should the Court of Justice eventually adopt his opinion, in the closely watched case of Schrems v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm
Freedom of Information The Panopticon Blog has a post on last’s weeks decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v Hungary, in relation to the Article 10 right to freedom of information. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
That missionary role is especially evident in the context of European relations with states at the initial phases of development and with Marxist Leninist States. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Schaefer v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm
Third, he contends that his First Amendment rights to free exercise of religion, as well as to freedom of information, were violated. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
This is in line with one of the “limiting principles” in the law of breach of confidence, as stated in the Spycatcher litigation (Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 HL) that the law would not protect the trivial or the anodyne. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 11:41 am
Supreme Court made clear in Riley v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:45 am
The Proposal includes not only a draft version of the Directive, but also the traditional Explanatory Memorandum and two Annexes on transparency related information for CMOs (Annex I) and explanatory documents to be provided by Member States accompanying the implementation (Annex II). [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm
In Burns v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 2:57 pm
The EU Treaties provide that "The Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law, principles which are common to the Member States. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 5:10 am
In finding that it is, the CRTC held that CASL meets the 5-part test set out in R. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:09 pm
We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy for those complaints last year and wer told that that office had no records (https://www.eff.org/document/eff-fioa-request-tech-bias-story-sharing-tool).Section 5 commands the Attorney General to convene a group to look at existing state laws and propose model state legislation to address unfair and deceptive practices by online platforms. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
Jane BambauerFor the conference on Public Health in the Shadow of the First AmendmentThis is Part Two of a two-part post on the First Amendment issues raised in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
Finally, the doctrinal reason for not having the military commission review these two additional violations is found in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:44 am
" On 25 March 2008, in MedellÃÂn v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am
Huawei/Conversant v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
In Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:54 pm
(In passing, I note human rights commissions have stated explicitly that while genuine religious claims can infringe the legislation and possibly require accommodation, personal preferences or “a singular belief” does not fall within human rights religious protection: see, for example, here.) [read post]
