Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 1:34 pm
Berry, 2 Ohio St.2d 169, 207 N.E.2d 545; Snyder v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:39 pm
The decision of the court may be oral or in 30 writing and shall state the facts it deems essential. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:58 am
On October 15, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Jovani Fashion, Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:13 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
As its name suggests, the expropriation exception supplies federal courts with jurisdiction over certain cases concerning property taken by a foreign government: A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case . . . in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue and that property or any property exchanged for such property is… [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 5:17 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
In the event that extradition is denied on that basis, Article 3(2) requires the Requested State to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution if the Requesting State so requests and if the laws of the Requested State so allow. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 3:01 am
Another factor is the question of what would become of such property (including trade marks) once forfeited to the State. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 10:20 am
Once we qualify the copies as “electronic,” it becomes unmistakable that this case deals with intangible items, not traditional “chattel” that are, by definition, tangible items. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 4:13 am
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company,2 the Court stated: Here, plaintiff reported the loss to defendant's agent by letter dated November 26, 1974, and enclosed a list of all items stolen and the value of each. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 7:07 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
-EU Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance Agreements and the other related bilateral instruments between the United States and European Union Member States. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 11:11 am
State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 3:31 am
Charles O'Hara won in State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
State and CBP are under no obligation to list restricted items with more specificity than the statute commands, and they are certainly not required to impose restrictions on a coin-by-coin basis. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
No false or forged documents were used to bring the items into the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
(I’m not sure this is true, as a property teacher who recently taught State v. [read post]
