Search for: "State v. Kay"
Results 501 - 520
of 641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 1:04 pm
With approximately 80 million broadband connections in the United States, that’s a cool $7.2 billion in new funds available to USF—instantly nearly doubling its size to over $16 billion a year. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
In addition, the authority of local and state regulatory agencies will be usurped by the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 pm
If the answer was yes, then the second issue was whether Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No.3) [2009] UKHL 28 applies in this context so as to require the Home Office to provide a gist of the closed material upon which it seeks to rely to the employee and his legal representatives. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Click Here Cory King settles with state on feedlot charges. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
A letter was sent to Ms W stating the conclusion but giving no reasons. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
A letter was sent to Ms W stating the conclusion but giving no reasons. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
Third, amidst the usual welter of authorities being discussed, it was particularly interesting to see the Irish cases (Donegan v Dublin CC [2008] IEHC 288; Dublin CC v Gallagher [2008] IEHC 354) being drawn on in this context, although they are a bit of a sideshow. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:06 am
Ty, Inc., 362 F.3d 986, 992 (7th Cir. 2004); United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:10 am
This case involves a life insurance policy issued by New York Life Insurance Company to the CEO of Mary Kay Cosmetics. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:30 am
Barbara Kay Huff won a dismissal of a vehicular homicide charge in State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:34 am
Specifically Judge Kay stated as follows: This court is aware that quantum of damage awards in cases similar to the one at bar vary dramatically. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
In this case, Mr Raw (incidentally a veteran of the Kay v Lambeth short-life housing battles and still in the same property despite an order for possession being made) had applied as homeless to Lambeth. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
In this case, Mr Raw (incidentally a veteran of the Kay v Lambeth short-life housing battles and still in the same property despite an order for possession being made) had applied as homeless to Lambeth. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:47 am
The Supreme Court in the 1995 case of Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:28 pm
The case cite is Loops LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
Rumour has it that Dixon is off to the ECHR; Kay v UK is on the horizon; and then there's the CA bust-up over gateway b let alone the nine-person SC in Pinnock. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
Rumour has it that Dixon is off to the ECHR; Kay v UK is on the horizon; and then there's the CA bust-up over gateway b let alone the nine-person SC in Pinnock. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:59 pm
Part V. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
“It is critical that the state not offer carbon credits for business-as-usual management by timber companies or, worse, encourage clearcutting and other destructive logging practices while doing nothing to address the immediate impacts of climate change. [read post]
