Search for: "State v. Kind" Results 501 - 520 of 21,346
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2024, 8:09 am by Mark Ashton
Supreme Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by Corina Heri
Switzerland case concerned a group of older Swiss women; the territorially and substantively ambitious Duarte Agostinho v. 32 Member States was brought by six Portuguese children and young people; and Carême v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
First, he states that "the standard rationale for common carrier regulation is that the firms in question have some kind of monopoly power. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Phil Dixon
That kind of language about the issue is difficult to square with cases like State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by Nicholas Noe
The Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Profit maximization is often conveyed to students today as a kind of natural law of economics or as a scientific, even pseudo-religious truth.[7] Profit-making is indeed a sine qua non of business. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I was also counsel—though not lead counsel—in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
He successfully argued New York Times v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States—establishes that the government may restrict false speech when it threatens a "legally cognizable harm" but does not do much to spell out what kinds of harms are legally cognizable. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]