Search for: "State v. Lilly" Results 501 - 520 of 912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 pm by Bexis
Eli Lilly & Co., 113 F.3d 1426, 1429 (6th Cir. 1997) ("A federal court in a diversity case is not free to engraft onto state rules exceptions or modifications which may commend themselves to the federal court, but which have not commended themselves to the State in which the federal court sits") (refusing to adopt [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 8:26 am by James Kwong
A common one is the absence of knowledge of the wrongdoing, as demonstrated in the case of L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG, where the High Court stated that eBay “did not know that such infringements had occurred and were likely to continue to occur” and this (amongst other factors) were not enough to make eBay liable as joint tortfeasors. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 1:51 pm by Brendan Kevenides
  Our state's appellate court did Illinois bicyclists a solid with its holding in Pattullo-Banks v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
  In the consultation report of the neurologist states: “Neurontin is wholly appropriate in this patient. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:02 am by Eric Alexander
  The only case the court had before it from a state court in one of the four states at issue was an unpublished decision in Linnen v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Image credits: Sleepwalking - GIPHYAmsterdam - Shovy Rahman PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 194 [weeks ending 13th and 20th May] Important amendments under Mexican law regarding patents, utility models and industrial designs | Decoding the Scope of Patent Protection: Singapore after Eli Lilly v. [read post]