Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 501 - 520
of 4,035
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2008, 2:13 am
Today the United Kingdom's Court of Appeal (Civil Division) released its judgment in AS & DD v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which concerned the lawfulness of the deportation of the applicant to Libya, pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with the proposed receiving state. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:29 am
Lord Carloway agreed with Lord Tyre and his reasoning. and held on that basis Lord Tyre was correct to find that no prima facie case existed. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
The appeal is set down for a one day hearing before Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 3:00 am
Lord Sumption gave the reasons for the referral to the Court of Justice, with which the rest of the Justices agreed. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Lord Reed gave a dissenting judgment. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
It would be fair to say that the House of Lords judgment in the joined appeals in Birmingham v Ali and Moran v Manchester [2009] UKHL 36 has come as something of surprise. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:15 am
Netherlands (1979) 1 EHRR 647; Ozturk v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:54 am
In Askew v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Secretary of state had reasonable grounds for suspecting BF involved in terrorism. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm
I refer to the treatment of that decision by Lord Oliver of Aylmerton in A.G. v Guardian [1987] 1 WLR 1248 at 1319 D-E, referred to by Bingham LJ in the Court of Appeal in A.G. v Guardian Newspapers (No. 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 at 217C. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
However, Lord Carnwath had two difficulties with this proposition. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 3:29 am
Even so, to benefit from this cash flow advantage, Lord Hodge states that the taxpayer must formally calculate his tax liability on the return itself; it is not enough simply to include the final figure as part of a covering letter. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Sumption gave the main judgment. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
Lord Sumption rejected this, stating that the directives leave various matters to member states to determine, but the domestic schemes were nonetheless part of a scheme for implementing an EU tax. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
College of Dental Surgeons of Puerto Rico v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
On Jan. 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S, v. [read post]
