Search for: "State v. Mann" Results 501 - 520 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann has this blog’s analysis of Wednesday’s argument in Taggart v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 7:26 am
It is not unknown for HL decisions to be influenced by politics (for example Lord Hoffmans judgement in Birmingham City Council v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Ronald Mann analyzed the decision for this blog. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:54 am by Mary A. Fischer
” The specter of another high-profile Texas death penalty case looms over Skinner v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:17 am
., writes: Foreign extraditions are likely to become more and more frequent in an increasingly globalized world, so United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
Garry Norman MANN v Portugual and the United Kingdom – 360/10 [2011] ECHR 337 (1 February 2011) Gary Mann, sentenced to 2 years in Portuguese jail for football riot in 2004, loses case before ECtHR against extradition. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:46 am by Brian Cordery
The patent in issue was previously litigated in Schlumberger v EMGS. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm by almaraz
Sterne Roberta Mann Federal, State, and Local Climate Change Tax Policies: Coordination or Cross-Purpose? [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann has this blog’s opinion analysis, and Subscript’s graphic explainer is here. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, the plaintiffs claim of damages remains speculative and unascertainable (see Parola, Gross & Marino, P.C. v Susskind, 43 AD3d 1020, 843 NYS2d 104 [2d Dept 20071; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292,727 NYS2d 58 [Ist Dept 20011, Oot v Arno, 275 AD2d 1023,713 NYS2d 382 [4th Dept 20001). [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann previewed the second case slated for argument today, Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]