Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 501 - 520
of 19,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:21 am
See Couture v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 7:13 am
Inc. v Bedford Clothiers, Inc., 143 AD3d 491, 493 [1st Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
”) State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Friday, January 22, 2013, will mark the fortieth anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
John Bean Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The U.S. appointed Julie Bédard and Canada named Mark C. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:16 pm
The California Supreme Court granted review of Adolph v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
First, with regard to acquiescence, section 48 of the Trade Marks Act of 1994 states the following: “(1) Where the proprietor of an earlier trade mark or other earlier right has acquiesced for a continuous period of five years in the use of a registered trade mark in the United Kingdom, being aware of that use, there shall cease to be any entitlement on the basis of that earlier trade mark or other right— to apply for a… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm
United States being overruled. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:23 am
As a threshold matter under the Rogers test, a plaintiff cannot state a viable trademark claim in the context of an artistic work (1) unless the defendant’s use of the mark ‘‘has no artistic relevance to the underlying work whatsoever,’’ or (2) ‘‘if it has some artistic relevance, unless the [use of the mark] explicitly misleads as to the source or the content of the work. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
On October 17, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case Mark Schwartz, Individually and as the Executor of the Estate of Kathleen Schwartz, et al. v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 3:36 am
Here is an Emporia Gazette article reporting that Tom Lemon won an acquittal in State v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:12 am
Oral Argument in case: 06-1637; Jennings, Mark v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
As a result he referred a number of questions to the CJEU.Parallel importation In Advocate General Jacobs opinion in Joined Cases C-143/00 and C-443/99 Boehringer Ingelheim KG & Ors v Swingward Ltd & Ors [2003] Ch 27 (Boehringer I) he stated that the notice requirement in Condition 5 dated from the Hoffmann-La Roche & Co AG v Centrafarm Bertriebsgesellschaft Pharmazeutischer Erezeugnisse mBH [1978] ECHR 1139 where that Court explained that the trade… [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:23 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:20 am
We can now confirm the full agenda and part of the line-up, as follows:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “The fragile state of relations between service providers and brand owners: life after the UK Supreme Court decision in Cartier v Sky”Moderator: Eleonora Rosati(University of Southampton and JIPLP Co-Editor)Confirmed Panellists: Catherine Palmer(Legal Director at… [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:04 pm
North American Olive Oil Ass’n v. [read post]
