Search for: "State v. Market" Results 501 - 520 of 25,203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 9:02 am by Dennis Crouch
The court emphasized that jurisdiction will lie only where the defendant “targeted a forum state by identifying listings for removal that, if removed, affect the marketing, sales, or other activities in that state. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
Maritas * 512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the Defense–Digital Marketing v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am by husovec
The last four months in the DSA news feel like two years. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:00 am by Donnelly L. McDowell
Despite its length, the Guidance conspicuously omits any reference to last fall’s landmark decision in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 CommentThis decision will provide some reassurance to owners of famous or iconic marks who may have experienced, due to market conditions outside of their control, a down-tick in sales over a period of time, that market share is not the only factor which determines the reputation of a mark. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Owns or Operates Financial Services Sector Infrastructure The entity owns or operates any legal entity that qualifies as one or more of the financial services entities specified in the Proposed Regulation, including (i) A banking or other organization regulated by the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, or the FDIC under certain regulations; (ii) A federally insured credit union regulated by the NCUA under a specific regulation; (iii) A designated contract market, swap execution facility,… [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:52 am by Unknown
In the plaintiffs’ view, the new rule “represents simply the latest example of the Commission’s attempts to thoughtlessly apply rules geared toward traditional financial markets to the digital assets industry” (Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas v. [read post]