Search for: "State v. McDonnell"
Results 501 - 520
of 524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am
Accordingly, the member states should support the right to education, in particular those facing disadvantages, or having special needs. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am
Thus, for example, price discounts aimed at recreating the right balance among spectrum fees are not considered State aid. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
The term is connected to a number of other similar terms that seek to give meaning to the same set of practices or states of social being: for example, the German-English Weltanschauung) or perhaps “lifeworlds. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:16 pm
(b) The admitting nurse shall formulate a plan of care (POC) stating the risk of falling and if the patient is at risk, then nurse shall implement reasonable specific reasonable nursing actions to prevent falling including but not limited to the following: … [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:52 am
The “V” initially stands out, but upon second glance, the “M” is revealed. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
One implication is that this could apply to state-owned enterprises. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:54 pm
The recent case of Stansberry v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
I will be writing more about the UCC Article 3 v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
The Constitution expressly states that the president can be impeached for bribery. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing… [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
And also, a starkly different holding from the Tenth Circuit in the wake of Egbert v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
q=respectfully+ An employer’s unilaterally adopted policy providing health insurance benefits to employees upon retirement may be rescinded with respect to employees retiring after the effective of the rescission http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_08686.htm Anatomy of an administrative disciplinary decision http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_01764.htm Appeals involving efforts to remove a member of a school board from office… [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
q=respectfully+ An employer’s unilaterally adopted policy providing health insurance benefits to employees upon retirement may be rescinded with respect to employees retiring after the effective of the rescission http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_08686.htm Anatomy of an administrative disciplinary decision http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_01764.htm Appeals involving efforts to remove a member of a school board from office… [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
As a consequence, courts were urged to develop the notion of frustration of the contract, which allows for termination of an agreement when the circumstances are “in a fundamental respect different from those which were envisaged”.6)In the definition of Davis Contractos Ltd. v. [read post]
