Search for: "State v. Morales " Results 501 - 520 of 7,381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Whether a particular crisis happens during a recession or not (and how big a recession), the state of capital markets at the time of the crisis, and the quality of state politics will surely have an effect on the harms created by austerity, default or moral hazard. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:12 am
 On this specific point, the court first recalled that the California courts have set a high bar for repugnancy and underlined that, according to the Ohno’s decision, which dealt with Japanese tort law, repugnancy does not mean that the foreign judgment is contrary to the U.S. public policy, but rather that it is so offensive to the public policy to be prejudicial to recognized standards of morality and to the general interests of the citizens. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 2:40 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Percy & Wayne Sandholtz, Why norms rarely die Anette Stimmer & Jess Gliserman, Disentangling norms, morality, and principles: the September 2019 Brexit rebellion Mathias Koenig-Archibugi & Luka Bareis, Do international parliaments matter? [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:00 pm
In late 2016, in its highly-watched decision in Salman v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am by jpfaff
If the Court started saying "we're just guessing here," perhaps it would lose some of its moral suasion. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel discusses Comcast v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am by CMS
His judgment stated that “the harm caused by the repudiation of the promise is not the same as the detriment suffered. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 10:41 pm
Finally, Part V compares building green as a moral and as a legal obligation in a world of uncertain possibilities and unintended consequences. [read post]