Search for: "State v. Oxford" Results 501 - 520 of 1,726
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
states, “we may not engraft our own exceptions onto the statutory text. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am by INFORRM
United States Talks of a federal privacy law continue in the United States, the New York Times reports. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:00 pm by Unknown
Press, Forthcoming Feb. 2020)- Preprint version of chapter.Gold Open Access [info]Articles:"And Then the War Came: A Content Analysis of Resilience Processes in the Narratives of Refugees from Humans of New York," International Journal of Communication, vol. 13 (2019)"As Iron Sharpens Iron: A Mentoring Approach to Labour Market Integration for Humanitarian Migrants," International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, vol. 17, no. 2 (2019)"Australian Media and… [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm by Giles Peaker
Oxford City Council v Dr Piechnik, County Court at Oxford, 31 July 2019 (Unreported elsewhere, we’ve seen the judgment.) [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
  A Constitution Day plea for the study of state constitutions (Real Clear Politics). [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm by Matthias Weller
, Oxford University Press 2017, Chapter 1 – another contribution to which the presenters made reference. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A small handful of cases involving judicial review have ensured the CICB continued to achieve the goals stated in the Act in a reasonable manner. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:41 am by Caroline Shaw
See, for example, William Wickwar, The Struggle for Freedom of the Press, 1819-1832 (London: George, Allen, Unwin, 1928); Deborah Cohen, Family Secrets: Shame and Privacy in Modern Britain (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013); and David Vincent, I Hope I Don't Intrude: Privacy and its Dilemmas in Nineteenth-Century Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has considered how the FTC can help safeguard privacy rights with legislative mandates from Congress. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am by Patricia Hughes
This approach is more in keeping with the presidential system in, for example, the United States, and not consistent with the Westminster form of government, in which an election can occur at any time, with the approval of the Governor General. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am by CMS
He refers to R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, noting it is consistent with the UK Government position. 1449: David Johnston QC refers to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011 in accordance with which dissolution must take place. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The New York Times remained unimpressed, stating, “So now we get to replace Oxford comma pedantry with semicolon pedantry. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
”Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law (anne.fleming@law.georgetown.edu), ProfessorHousehold Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow AmericaCaley Horan, MIT (cdhoran@mit.edu) Associate Professor “Investing in the stars: Astrology and capitalism in modern America”Gautham Rao, American University (grao@american.edu) American University, Associate Professor“The Master's State: Slavery and the American State. [read post]