Search for: "State v. Pac" Results 501 - 520 of 726
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) In today’s Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Although the Supreme Court in the Citizens United case had found that the availability of a separate political action committee (PAC) for a corporation was not a sufficient substitute for a right to spend freely from its own treasury, since a PAC was hard to create and maintain, the Montana court said the state’s law made it easy to create a corporate PAC. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm by David Bernstein
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm by David Bernstein
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of one’s speech will be… [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:32 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Saturday starts tonight - my college football picks: PAC 12 CHAMPIONSHIP GAME - Autzen Stadium - Eugene, Oregon v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:35 am by Aaron Tang
., growth in “Super PACs”) reveal anything about the correctness of the Court’s reasoning in Citizens United. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 9:51 am by Sam Favate
The proposed amendment would also reverse the 1976 decision Buckley v Valeo, which held that spending money is a form of speech in elections. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:21 am by Conor McEvily
  For this blog’s Academic round-up, Amanda Frost examines some of the academic commentary on the Fourth Amendment’s applicability to GPS surveillance, an issue the Court will take up in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:06 am by Gene Takagi
v=dzcRSr… via @robreich For more interesting tweets, follow me and Emily on Twitter. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:38 am by George Ticoras
In an statement released by the FEC, it stated, consistent with its agreement to a stipulated order and consent judgment in Carey v. [read post]