Search for: "State v. Pardon" Results 501 - 520 of 843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2014, 3:56 am
  Given the evidence presented, the jury was completely right in saying that the State did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:17 am by Sean Mirski
” In any case, the petitioner points to the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:12 am by Giles Peaker
MR JUSTICE OUSELEY: I beg your pardon? [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:12 am by Giles Peaker
MR JUSTICE OUSELEY: I beg your pardon? [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Coke's inauguration restored Democratic control in Texas.Imagine if, upon receipt of the Supreme Court order in Bush v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:28 am by Broc Romanek
Yet it remains an occasional favorite of elder argufiers when they have no authority, and no reasoning of their own, with which to impress the wide-eyed attenders of periodic assizes.- Taylor v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Congress' commerce authority includes the power to regulate those activities having a substantial relation to interstate commerce as held in United States v Lopez. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
  In 1986, the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles pardoned Frank “in recognition of the State’s failure to protect [his] person” but nevertheless did not attempt “to address the question of guilt or innocence. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 12:21 pm
The pardon, therefore, couldn't have been due to concern about patent hold-up, as was stated [PDF], since the ITC specifically found that Samsung had negotiated with Apple in good faith, had already licensed the '348 patent to over 30 companies, and that it was, in fact, Apple that illustrated the danger of reverse hold-up. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]