Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 501 - 520
of 13,188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 2:01 pm
Fox Business, The Willis Report, May 4, 2011 Host Gerri Willis http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4677710 “We’re definitely losing some money through what’s called transfer pricing, where corporations operating in the United States, as well as other countries, find ways—legal ways typically—of locating their profits in countries that have lower tax rates. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
’ ConocoPhillips Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:57 pm
Nix v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:55 pm
I'm rooting for the United States Postal Service. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:06 am
The court ultimately concluded that the disappointing sales numbers and resulting stock price drop were more plausibly related to customer reaction to the company's public relations issues than its accounting practices (Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:36 pm
Gregory Earl Pollard v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:39 pm
The power district moved to dismiss the case, arguing that it cannot be sued under federal antitrust law because Arizona law gives it the authority to set prices – a doctrine known as “state-action immunity. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
86/03 Greece v Commission [2005] ECR I? [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:52 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:24 am
On April 19, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Hughes v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 10:01 pm
.'s Prescription Drug Excessive Pricing Act of 2005 preempted by federal patent laws and enjoining its enforcement.In Biotechnology Industry Organization v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Charlie’s Waste Services, LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:32 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Desierto, Investment Pricing and Social Protection: A Proposal for an ICESCR-adjusted Capital Asset Pricing Model John Y. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:11 am
See also Daniels v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:41 am
Cuomo, 66 NY2d 185, 190-191 [1985], citing United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:45 am
Under federal law, minimum resale price maintenance has been considered lawful if reasonable under the circumstances since the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am
(09-1298) and Boeing Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 2:43 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court hears argument in Bowman v. [read post]
