Search for: "State v. Quick"
Results 501 - 520
of 4,923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am
The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 Just a quick note to confirm that the Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the Court of Appeal decision (reported here) that the Secretary of State cannot use common law claims to recover overpayments of social security benefits where the overpayment is by reason of acccident or error on the part of the benefit agency. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am
The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 Just a quick note to confirm that the Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the Court of Appeal decision (reported here) that the Secretary of State cannot use common law claims to recover overpayments of social security benefits where the overpayment is by reason of acccident or error on the part of the benefit agency. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:28 am
While passage of this legislative package won’t magically fix these challenges, it will provide quick relief for some of the ObamaCare expense and restrictions and expand the choices that Americans, American business, payers, providers and States while Congress works with American to identify and pursue legislative, regulatory, marketplace and other improvements. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Law v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
In any case, today’s pro se lawsuit, like numerous lawsuits preceding it, goes nowhere and gets a quick dismissal. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:36 am
More SESTA/FOSTA-Related Posts: * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
By contrast, if a convention follows the ratification process under Article V, any change would require approval of thirty-eight state legislatures or state conventions. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am
In Brown v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
STATE V. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
A quick recap: last summer, Texas passed HB20, a #MAGA messaging bill that poses existential threats to the Internet as we know it. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
With the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:39 am
Below is a quick rundown of the most recent links. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:17 am
The pace of purchases was so great on fight night that the bout was delayed by about a half-hour to process the flurry of late orders. * Katz v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm
In my recent post on City of Corona v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:59 pm
Pending that, I want to make a quick note of a very disturbing choice of words in the opinion. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:15 pm
The first, Golden State Water Company v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 11:24 am
Here is a quick overview of the docket: 1. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
The exchange was quick, and seemingly uneventful. [read post]
