Search for: "State v. Race" Results 501 - 520 of 8,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 4:55 am
If you want to read about a large number of issues in federal criminal law in one place, you should check out United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:35 am by JB
His view was that "[t]he destinies of the two races, in this country, are indissolubly linked together," but "[t]here is a race so different from our own that we do not permit those belonging to it to become citizens of the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
In the case of O’Reilly v Edgar ([2019] QSC 24) the Supreme Court of Queensland awarded Kelvin O’Reilly, the CEO of a go-kart racing organisation, $270 658.71 in damages, including aggravated damages, for defamatory posts by a Facebook troll. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Authorship in fact v. authorship in law is gendered/raced; work v. play distinction means some of us are disenfranchised from labor/means of production while others become owners. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 10:57 am by Greg Mersol
Most employers today have anti-harassment policies covering race, gender and other types of discrimination to help comply with state and federal antidiscrimination legislation and to take advantage of the affirmative defense described in Faragher v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 2:36 pm
As Justice Scalia stated plainly in Grutter, in his view, the "Constitution proscribes government discrimination on the basis of race, and state-provided education is no exception. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
A New York Times editorial points out that lawyers and courts are ignoring the landmark case of Batson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:49 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Vanaskie, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals addressed a Defendant's request submitted to a Plaintiff for the payment of costs associated with e-discovery in the case of Race Tires America, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am by Vik Amar
Seattle School District No. 1 that flirted with a ban on individualized race consideration, and his separate writing in City of Richmond v. [read post]
” They stated that Harvard has rejected race-neutral alternatives in applying these admissions standards. [read post]