Search for: "State v. Rivers" Results 501 - 520 of 3,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2013, 10:45 am
 The Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Rock River Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
The M/V Crown was originally placed into service as a functioning gambling boat that would cruise the Calcasieu River in Lake Charles.  [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am by Kiran Bhat
At issue in the case is Montana’s contention that Wyoming’s upstream use of increasingly efficient irrigation techniques in two tributaries of the Yellowstone River violates Montana’s rights under the Yellowstone River Compact of 1950. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:47 am by Stephen Wermiel
Maryland, a 2003 decision involving rights to the Potomac River; New Jersey v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court raised those questions on Monday about a fight between two western states over use of the waters of a river they share. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 3:14 pm
He had a potential job in Powell River, British Columbia, but that feel through. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:28 pm by WIMS
Co. of Am., 316 U.S. 491 (1942), to remand the declaratory judgment action, and that the action for damages fell within the scope of Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:41 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (Health Care Costs - Veterans) United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:06 am by Native American Rights Fund
Washburn (Indian Child Welfare Act - Unconstitutional)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.html Kaplan v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 2:39 pm by Unknown
United States (Breach of Trust; National Indian Forest Resources Management Act) Gila River Indian Community, et al. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:40 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
The court, wading into the often labyrinthine doctrine of federal court abstention and the related Colorado River “wise judicial administration doctrine,” held that the stay could not be reviewed on appeal because resolution of the earlier state court proceeding would not effectively deprive the federal court of jurisdiction to determine the trademark claims once the stay was lifted (Window World International, LLC v. [read post]