Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 501 - 520
of 56,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
One thing Biden said was clearly true. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
(David Kopel) So said the unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:28 pm
In Crawford v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 11:20 pm
Later this month, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of Virginia v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 10:54 am
The states are bound by the federal retroactivity standard the Court laid down in Teague v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:43 am
" (b) "I’m not familiar precisely with what I said, but I’ll stand by what I said, whatever it was. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 5:20 pm
The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's award and said "No. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:57 pm
Buccellati v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
What I said: The interesting twist here came during the defense attorney's cross examination of [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 12:37 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:50 pm
"); United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 12:26 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:43 am
In a case illustrating how a minority position can shift into a majority holding, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Coleman v. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The Supreme Court It is incumbent on the state to establish any wrongdoing. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 10:16 am
In a Letter to the Editor published in the Albany Times Union today, Neil V. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 2:45 pm
Quoting Fletcher: The case is narrowly focused on the state’s ability to sue under the tribal-state compact — not the merits of the casino question itself, said Matthew Fletcher, director of the Indigenous Law and Policy Center at Michigan State University. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
Citing Barrett v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:53 pm
In State v O’Brien, the defendant attempted to circumvent the one and done rule by reopening his prior (20 yr old) marijuana related CD in the municipal court. [read post]
