Search for: "State v. Simon" Results 501 - 520 of 1,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2010, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
The defence of “fair comment” is, of course, in the news at the moment due to the victory of Mr Simon Singh in the case of British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 11:32 pm
In reaching its decision, the Court relied on language in the United States Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 1:10 pm
Robert Simon (docket) -United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia- Whether or note US Courts have jurisdiction over events transpiring in Iraq prior to the US occupation. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
Since 2001 when the Georgia Supreme Court decided State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:24 am by Andy Dorchak
 United States consumers were harmed economically, in that the higher prices charged were part of $300 million in retail sales from the five publishers, including $40 million for e-books licensed through Apple’s iBookstore. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Ryan Anderson
As the four dissenting opinions make abundantly clear, today’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:03 am by Peter Mahler
Simon v Moskowitz In Simon v Moskowitz, the Appellate Division affirmed in part and reversed in part a lower court’s order dismissing claims by a minority member against the majority member of a profitable, two-member LLC that owns a 60-unit, rental apartment building in the Bronx. [read post]