Search for: "State v. Soules" Results 501 - 520 of 812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2021, 10:30 am by Gene Takagi
Inside the Koch-Backed Effort to Block the Largest Election-Reform Bill in Half a Century via @NewYorkerBrian Galle: Pleased to have been able to help draft this amicus brief on behalf of non-profit scholars in AFPF v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
Some of the critics thought that we were either ignorant or intentionally playing dumb about whether drug companies could be "state actors" for constitutional purposes. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That was and will be the broadest statute to revive SOLs in the United States, because the Supreme Court considered the law and held that criminal SOLs may not be revived, because that would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause in Stogner v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:29 am
However, his lawyers have explicitly stated that he is selective in licensing his work. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:30 am
” That title incites optimism in our scurvy soul. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:27 am by Shaheen Rahman
[Section 149] has a significant role to play” and R(Bapio Action Ltd) v SSHD (2007) EWCA Civ 1139, where it was stated that Due regard must be an essential preliminary to any important policy decision, not a rearguard action following a concluded decision. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
I am sure many faculty members are doing some soul-searching, perhaps regretting their original invitation. [read post]