Search for: "State v. Suit" Results 501 - 520 of 36,882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[9] Where suits are filed is also (for now) remarkably different from where they were filed in the past. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm by centerforartlaw
Legal civil suits were initiated in the New York Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
While many states look to Delaware as an authority on issues of corporate law, companies that are incorporated in other states should consult with local counsel to ensure that any relevant differences are taken into consideration. [2] See, e.g., Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
To me, it's one thing to say that there's no incentive to litigate when a party is sued for a tiny amount (say, $500) and potentially faces issue preclusion in a much bigger suit as a result. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Case Background The Supreme Court is poised to resolve this circuit split in Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
Whether the suit is brought in federal court or state court, the answer is the same: states have the reserved power to impose qualifications on their own state officials under the Tenth Amendment. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Farm The Maryland Court of Appeals answered this question incorrectly in Stickley v. [read post]