Search for: "State v. Superior Court"
Results 501 - 520
of 11,180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
The Court’s nearly unanimous decision in Bristol-Myers v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
Meanwhile, Mother filed an appeal to the Superior Court on April 26. [read post]
9 May 2021, 11:54 am
Marion Superior Court, (IN Sup. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 1:13 pm
Ontario Superior Court Justice Edward M. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:02 am
Supreme Court decision in the case of Mallory v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
In City of Garden Grove v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 10:40 am
The court of appeals held yesterday in State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:48 am
But I think that the trial court got this one right. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:28 pm
I wholeheartedly approve.Third, I also like how Justice Sills critiques a California Supreme Court case (here, Cosper v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:28 pm
The appellate court affirmed the trial court in State v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Supreme Court case of United States ex rel Touhy v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:41 am
Superior Court, case no. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:09 am
[2] Eckles v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 11:02 am
The State of New Hampshire, Grafton County Superior Court this week denied the Motion to Dismiss in the Dartmouth College II case, Association of Alumni of Dartmouth College v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:12 pm
So the State files the appropriate charges. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 1:52 pm
In the recent 2-1 decision of Knight v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Superior Court (2009) 46 Cal. 4th 969, 986. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:25 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:53 am
As we wrote here, in January 2020, state court Judge William Highberger issued a decision holding that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (“FAAAA”) preempts use of California’s version of the “ABC” test (as adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:01 pm
He explained he was instructed “not to say what goes on in the house cause they don’t want to go to court. [read post]