Search for: "State v. Two Bulls"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In the complaint, filed by an Indiana trademark lawyer, James Dean, Inc. asserted nine causes of action against Twitter: • Count I - Trademark Infringement Under Section 32(1) or 3(A) of the Lanham Act; • Count II - False Endorsement Under Lanham Act § 43(A); • Count III - Indiana State Statutory Right of Publicity; • Count IV - Common Law Right of Publicity; • Count V - Common Law Unfair Competition;… [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
• Kara Brockmeyer, head of the FCPA Unit in the Division of Enforcement, stated that the unit is off to a fast start in 2014. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
The Supreme Court of Canada stated the proper procedure in a case called R. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
The Supreme Court of Canada stated the proper procedure in a case called R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:35 pm
Fox during the second part of a two-part webinar presented by the National Employment Law Institute (NELI). [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Although the complaint lists two Defendants, Noble Roman's states that Defendant B & MP was involuntarily dissolved in 2011 and that Defendant Leslie Perdriau succeeded to its obligations. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 11:30 pm
Dasher v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 11:30 pm
Dasher v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
Practice Tip: The United States Supreme Court addressed the elements required for trade dress to be protected in Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
In the complaint, filed by an Indiana trademark lawyer, in conjunction with trademark attorneys from Florida and Georgia, the following counts are asserted: • Count I: Unfair Competition• Count II: Tortious Interference with Business Relationships and Prospective Advantage• Count III: Civil Conspiracy• Count IV: Unjust Enrichment• Count V: Conspiracy to Induce Breach of Contract• Count VI: Common Law… [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:00 am
Irreparable injury and an inadequate remedy at law are, after all, two of the primary requisites for writ review. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
Irreparable injury and an inadequate remedy at law are, after all, two of the primary requisites for writ review. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 9:42 am
In at least two prior cases, LeeWay Media Group, LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 2:31 pm
• Legal counsel should be aware that the attorney-client privilege would be impacted by the new DOL regulations, if finalized in their proposed form, thereby raising a potential conflict between state bar and federal LMRDA requirements, among other things. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 3:57 am
One of the most relevant and thorough is US v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
” Weinberger v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:58 am
[Estate of Ostlund v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:45 pm
Bull (wrongful termination)Skokomish Indian Tribe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
