Search for: "State v. Vest"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,969
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Hildebrandt (1916), Smiley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
Notable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention and Marbury v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 10:34 am
Cameron presents the related question whether a state attorney general who is vested with the power to defend state law should be permitted to intervene to defend a state law after a federal court of appeals invalidated that statute and no other state actor will defend the law. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
Bush and Boumediene v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:35 am
The case held, of course, that the states may not add qualifications to congressional candidates beyond those in the text of the Constitution. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
But even if a state legislature were to adopt this misguided measure, Bush v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:19 am
I had hoped that Troxel v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
(Michigan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
In Seafarers Pension Plan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
In Bellotti v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 4:00 pm
An “eligible designated beneficiary” means (i) a surviving spouse, (ii) a minor child, (iii) a disabled individual, (iv) a chronically ill individual, or (v) an individual who is not more than ten years younger than the participant [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:32 am
First, SB 672 ratifies “adequate consideration,” as articulated in Fifield v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 2:46 am
As stated in Nathanson v Nathanson, 20 AD3d 403, 403-04 [2d Dept 2005], even if the articles of organization vest management of the company in its members generally, “such vesting of authority is ‘subject to any provisions in . . . the operating agreement . . . granting or withholding the management powers or responsibilities of one or more members”’ (quoting LLCL § 401[a]). [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
The district court dismissed the suit for want of jurisdiction, concluding that Congress had implicitly precluded district-court jurisdiction over such actions by creating an alternative review scheme that bypasses district courts and vests judicial review of FTC cease-and-desist orders directly in the courts of appeals. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:02 pm
Kavanaugh has a bit of a vested interest here. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
But as became evident in Gundy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:29 am
I’ve not done anything close to a 50-state survey. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 11:15 am
Alexander Gulkarov and United States v. [read post]
