Search for: "State v. Vigil"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
Vigil, 336 P.3d 380, 386–88 (N.M. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
Vigil, 336 P.3d 380, 386–88 (N.M. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
The direct implication of this is that the Court is very vigilant when interpreting provisions in the relevant directives – notably the InfoSoc Directive – and not particularly keen in tolerating national solutions that go astray from what the relevant body of EU legislation allows Member States to do. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:36 am
See Southeastern Promotions v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 12:46 pm
Thus, although contractors may rely on their customer to identify CDI, they also must remain vigilant and proactive when it comes to safeguarding CDI. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 1:14 pm
In Washington v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Part V discusses the original approach to delinquency in the schools: “zero tolerance” policies. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Part V discusses the original approach to delinquency in the schools: “zero tolerance” policies. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:29 am
In Vigil v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:24 am
Safe Harbour agreement which was invalidated on October 6, 2015, by the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) ruling in Schrems v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:24 am
Safe Harbour agreement which was invalidated on October 6, 2015, by the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) ruling in Schrems v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:05 am
Read the May 2016 Order in State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
As stated by The Honourable Anne McLellan, Task Force Chair, “It is our hope that the recommendations contained in our report, taken together, will provide a foundation for a new system of regulatory safeguards for legal access to cannabis that aim to better protect health and to enhance public safety. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:02 am
The high court explained in Brinker Restaurant Corp v. [read post]
