Search for: "State v. Wales" Results 501 - 520 of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2014, 1:08 pm by Alexandra Allan
Under the governing charterparty – on the AmWelsh 1979 form – it was stated: “This Charter Party shall be governed by English law, and any dispute arising out of or in connection with this charter shall be submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales”. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:22 am
As previously reported here, the House of Lords' decision in  Johnston v NEI International Combustion [2007] UKHL 39 found that asymptomatic pleural plaque claims were not compensatable under the current laws. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:41 am by INFORRM
She has published numerous articles on the protection of privacy in England and Wales, New Zealand, and Europe. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:22 am
As previously reported here, the House of Lords' decision in  Johnston v NEI International Combustion [2007] UKHL 39 found that asymptomatic pleural plaque claims were not compensatable under the current laws. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:00 am by INFORRM
The notes to section 9 (Action against a person not domiciled in the UK or a Member State etc) indicate that the section “aims to address the issue of “libel tourism” (a term which is used to apply where cases with a tenuous link to England and Wales are brought in this jurisdiction)” but go on to point out that does not apply to a person domiciled in a EU Member state or a state which is party to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
In Clarke v Nursing and Midwifery Council of New South Wales [2020] NSWDC 641 Scotting DCJ dismissed claims for libel based on an email and other matters. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
  The dispute related to the third hurdle i.e. whether England and Wales is the proper forum to hear the case. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:52 am
There are a lot of crazies coming out of the woodwork with respect to the ACLU’s efforts to have the patent laws of the United States declared unconstitutional. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 11:37 pm by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Russell Sandberg: End of Litigation over Wales’ Relationships and Sexuality Education Code: The Court of Appeal has refused permission to appeal in the challenge against Wales’s new Relationships and Sexuality Education Code. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:48 am
This changed with the decision of the New South Wales Supreme Court in HIH Casualty & General Insurance Ltd (in liq) v Wallace [2006] NSWSC 1150; (2006) 68 NSWLR 603. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
DSD and NVB’s case was supported by a coalition of NGO-interveners all specialising in responding to violence against women (Rape Crisis England and Wales, End Violence against Woman Coalition, Southall Black Sisters, and the Nia Project), as well as Liberty. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 09597-19 Bremner v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication09539-19 A Woman v Hull Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), 9 Reporting of crime (2019), Breach- sanction: publication of adjudication 09155-19 Brown v thesundaytimes.co.uk,  1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07966-19 Water UK v The Times,1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction:… [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
In May 2013, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc.[2013] EWCA Civ 451 [on which see Norman Sierbrasse's guest Katpost here] unanimously affirmed Mr Justice Floyd's decision (in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC1789) with respect to the slide-to-unlock patent and held that “all the claims of 022 [Apple’s slide to unlock patent] are obvious in the light of Neonode” (paragraph 363). [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
 The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd [2015] EWHC 1773 (IPEC), a 29 June decision of Judge Richard Hacon in the increasingly impressive and cost-effective Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, is impressive not only in its length (123 paragraphs) but also for the fact that the court was able to deal with so many legal and evidential issues in just two hearing days. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Cart) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Respondent); R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) (FC) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 28, 22/6/2011 – read judgment; press summary here Unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are still subject to judicial review by the High Court, but only… [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts Australia    Matthews v Pigram [2020] NSWDC 526, a case in the District Court of New South Wales concerning three defamatory emails. [read post]