Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice"
Results 501 - 520
of 700
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– EPA News Release, July 28, 2010 A $13 million settlement has been reached between four parties and the United States to expedite cleanup of the contaminated Blackburn and Union Privileges Superfund Site in Walpole, Mass., the Justice Department and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:36 am
Justice Stevens did not participate in the decision. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm
In an opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, the Court held that the Sixth Amendment did require Padilla's lawyer to tell Padilla that his conviction for drug distribution made him subject to automatic deportation. -- To discuss the case, we have United States Military Academy at West Point Department of Social Sciences Professor Margaret D. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Justice Department and the states of Alabama and Iowa announced July 14. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
United States—the “honest services” case—has “no impact whatsoever” on its prosecution of Ring. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
United States, 556 U. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:07 pm
For now, business method patents live on, and United States patent law remains mostly unchanged by the decision in Bilski v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:49 am
Justices Stevens and Breyer wrote separate concurring opinions.Everyone expected that the majority opinion would be authored by departing Justice Stevens as his final decision, and it appears likely that the Court had earlier imagined that his opinion would collect majority approval; so it was a surprise, to me at least, that (a) Stevens' strike would have put the ball squarely in the net to knock out business method patents, though (b) his… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:51 am
Two decades ago, in Ortega v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:56 am
United States); McDonald, the Chicago gun rights case; and a couple of big First Amendment cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Dear Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas and Alito: My office is just a few miles up the street from yours. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:57 am
Department of Agriculture (USDA) has authority to prevent “the introduction of plant pests into the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:27 am
The decision was 8-0, Justice John Paul Stevens did not participate. [read post]
