Search for: "Stocking v. Ives" Results 501 - 520 of 650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2010, 12:28 pm by Nathan
  (If you’re interested in learning ways to defend such cases, you can check out our “Hope for Hopeless Cases” CLE series, particularly lectures IV and V.) [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii) for the… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:22 pm by David Zaring
·         SEC Review: Directs the SEC to clarify disclosures relating to compensation, including requiring companies to provide charts that compare their executive compensation with stock performance over a five-year period. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:34 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
Trustee's Office, which has zero tolerance and zero sense of humor for the "my dog ate the asset list with my cars and houses and stock portfolio on it" excuse. [read post]
30 May 2010, 5:28 am by Socrates & Cassandra
It is difficult to ignore that manic quality of the stock market. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:38 pm
The company may issue employee stock options (“ESOPs”) in accordance with the SEBI (Employee Stock Option and Employee Stock Purchase Scheme) Guidelines, 1999 where the options can be converted into ‘A’ Shares on the same terms as the existing ‘A’ Ordinary Shares. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:26 am by Carter Ruml
When the facts are as unfavorable to the taxpayer as they were in Estate of Malkin v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:26 am by Carter Ruml
  When the facts are as unfavorable to the taxpayer as they were in Estate of Malkin v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:39 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Under the proposed rules, which reflect a consensus among the various U.S. stock exchanges and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), trading in a stock would be paused for five minutes where the stock experienced a 10 percent change in price over a five minute period. [read post]