Search for: "Strauss v. Strauss"
Results 501 - 520
of 618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Pulka v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
Rev. 693 (1976) --Poe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Leo Strauss, The Crisis of Modern Natural Right: Burke, in Natural Right and History (1953). [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N D California grants summary judgment of invalidity based on on-sale bar: PartsRiver, Inc v Shopzilla, Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Subjective colours require definition to avoid indefiniteness: On the First Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc – Should obviousness be determined by the court or… [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
It seems unlikely that such oppositions will be filed.CCF previously sought to intervene in Strauss v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:38 am
Kansas v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:24 pm
[7] See also Levi Strauss Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:13 pm
As affirmed by Gummow J in Wingate Marketing Pty Ltd v Levi Strauss & Co[30], “whilst a trade mark remains on goods, it functions as an indicator of the person who attached or authorised the initial use of the mark”. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am
For example, in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:19 am
This issue is analogous to one that has received enormous attention, especially after Serdar Mohammed v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
KG v OHIM, Wedl & Hofmann GmbH) . [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
Publius would recognize the various themes that are the subject of essays in Part V of this Handbook (Mark Brandon, Oren Gross, Wayne Moore, David Strauss, Ernest Young, John Dinan, Jamal Green, Gerard Magliocca, Vicki Jackson, Heinz Klug, Elizabeth Beaumont, Maxwell Stearns, Paul Kahn). [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
Blue Buffalo Company Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 6:07 am
Leblang, and Jason Sison, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, on Monday, November 19, 2018 Tags: Carl Icahn, Dell, Fairness review, Hedge funds, IPOs, Mergers & acquisitions, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder meetings, Shareholder voting Bull or Bear? [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:08 am
Burdick, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, on Sunday, January 22, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Antitrust, Board composition, Boards of Directors, Brexit, CFIUS, Cybersecurity, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Europe, Executive Compensation, International governance, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, UK Mutual Funds As Venture Capitalists? [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
