Search for: "Super Delegates"
Results 501 - 520
of 607
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2008, 10:09 am
Paterson is a super-delegate for Hillary Clinton. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 7:58 am
The rules are the rules and wooing the Super Delegates seems to be a part of them. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 5:18 am
In my view, even if voters do not flee from Senator Clinton in the wake of a New York sex scandal, I suspect many super delegates have to be worried about how the Spitzer story can reinforce a Democratic "family values" immorality that Bill Clinton has long represented. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 9:53 am
Winning big states closer to the decision time for super delegates helps Hillary with the psychology of the super delegates. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 6:12 pm
The votes should count as is, the delegates should be awarded and seated. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 12:37 pm
Lately this dynamic is found not only in the commonly held view that Senator Barack Obama simply cannot oppose the inclusion of Florida and Michigan in the delegates tally or resist the alternative of a new vote, but also in the notion that the super delegates to the Democratic Party's convention must not cast their votes in defiance of the sanctity of the majority's vote; even though the very reason for having super delegates is to supplement… [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
Because Alabama voted on Super Tuesday, the strange and troubling Alabama result flew under the radar. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 1:58 pm
By Big Tent Democrat Via Sargent, Newsweek finds Dems divided on what the Super Delegates should do: But Ras has this: In the craziness of the race for the Democratic Presidential Nomination, it is possible that one candidate might finish the Primary Season with the most pledged delegates while another could end up with the most popular votes. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 7:59 am
That is aimed not only at voters but, and I think much more importantly, also at Super Delegates. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 6:11 am
Why in the world do we have super delegates? [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:39 am
If the delegate count was the decisive criteria it is now painted as, how could we possibly have accepted having so many super delegates? [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 2:30 am
It increasingly looks like the super delegates will determine who will be the Democratic Party nominee for President. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 8:02 am
She engineered the Florida/Michigan fiasco, threatened to bolt the Party if the super delegates did not do her bidding and now has taken to publicly smearing the Clinton campaign: Despite Obama's impressive victories in February, Clinton's comeback is based on sowing political seeds of doubt," said Donna Brazile, a Democratic strategist and one of nearly 800 party leaders known as superdelegates for their ability to determine the nomination. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 5:06 am
There are some realities that the Super Delegates should consider when deciding which nominee to throw their support behind. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 9:13 am
There are 700+ Super delegates who will decide who the nominee is. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 9:19 am
The Super Delegates will use their own criteria. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 4:14 pm
If the pledged delegate count shows a 50 delegate lead or an 90 pledged delegate lead or what have you, she needs to have a narrative as to why the Super Delegates should vote for her. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 5:43 pm
The same belief led to the cluster of states joined together in Super Tuesday, all of whom apparently believed that that would be the last day of the campaign. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 4:31 am
CLINTON CAMPAIGN flips on super delegates. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 4:51 am
She would have lost the important narrative she could argue to super delegates, that Obama has not shown an ability to win contested big states and that a slim lead among pledged delegates and a virtual tie in the popular vote signals a tie. [read post]
