Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 501 - 520
of 4,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 10:15 am
Meanwhile, Apple and other tech companies are bolstering the security of their devices in response to consumer demand and the new threats to security cropping up every day. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:37 am
Belfiore v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
Supreme Court’s finding, in AT&T v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:55 am
Given that in Canada the recent Richard v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:02 am
Zazzle * Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Print-on-Demand Vendor–Atari v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:52 am
Indeed, consumer protection statutes are designed to protect consumers rather than to regulate corporate conduct.Celexa/Lexapro, slip op. at 5-6 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
” The court also upheld the arbitrator’s decision “that Section 230 immunity applies to consumer protection claims. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
To the extent ROP involves false or misleading attempts to hawk a product, this is just consumer protection law. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:07 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:33 pm
Ariix, LLC v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:14 pm
The Ninth Circuit recently decided Barnes v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
What is the relevance of strength of a mark for the scope of protection it receives? [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:16 pm
Ultimately, what we need is strong consumer privacy laws that remove the incentive for hoovering up personal data and monetizing it, and we need better antitrust enforcement. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:21 am
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 9:11 am
Utah has a weak/old-school anti-SLAPP law that doesn’t protect him. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
Much market behavior isn’t protected b/c it isn’t info producing. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Rearden LLC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:40 am
This argument was rejected in favour of tackling each separate objection to the claim language step-by-step.Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic reported on a recent decision of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, which held that the shape of Land Rover Defender cars cannot benefit from trade mark protection, bearing neither inherent nor acquired distinctiveness.OtherFormer GuestKat Laetitia Lagarde (Baker McKenzie) pointed to a number of ways in which IP lawyers are well-placed to… [read post]
