Search for: "TECHNICAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC." Results 501 - 520 of 811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2021, 9:19 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  For example, the Statement states a Health App would be covered under the FTC’s Health Breach Rule if it collects health information from a consumer and has the technical capacity to draw information through an API that enables synching with a consumer’s fitness tracker, but cites to cross references to the HIPAA Breach Rule in the Health Breach Rule to explain that a Health App developer is a “health care provider” subject to the HIPAA… [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:37 am by Raquel Leslie, Brian Liu
  The stark reversal of fortune at DiDi, once China’s most valuable startup, is emblematic of the wider travails of China’s consumer tech industry. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Aereo, he implied, is a service provider, not just a product dispenser. [read post]
6 May 2021, 8:24 am by Kristian Soltes
In the past few years, new financial products and delivery mechanisms have been introduced that work with traditional banking services. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
The model of post-rupture economic relations is only slowly emerging, but beyond the small scale and low level consumer markets, it is likely to be dominated by state gatekeeping in the form of applications, approvals, accountability and monitoring mechanisms. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
Dickstein Shapiro (Patently-O) ITC: No s 337 violation; investigation terminated in Certain Semiconductor Integration Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization and Products Containing Same involving complainants LSI and Agere (ITC 337 Law Blog) Fleshing out design patent infringement doctrine: Crocs v ITC (Patently-O)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Billingnetwork Patent – Court orders plaintiff to file separate patent suits against each defendant: Billingnetwork… [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:15 pm
(TTABlogged here).Maids to Order of Ohio, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
S.Con.Res.11 - An original concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2016 <> Energy Department Awards Nearly $10 Million for Efficient Lighting Development - The Department of Energy  announced nine research and development projects that will help accelerate the development of high-quality light-emitting diode (LED) and … [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm by Florian Mueller
Independent third-party analysis suggests that the majority of these patents are not technically essential to the UMTS standard. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
.* Not so secret agent: when Bond isn't 007 but 0.77In "The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no injunction", here, Darren wrote about the decision of Birss J in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc [2013] EWHC 3955 (Pat), a technically detailed case which amused Merpel, who commented that a case that started off being basically about chemistry ended up being basically about mathematics. [read post]