Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 501 - 520 of 21,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2007, 4:57 am
In determining whether exposure is actionable, the Supreme Court adopted the "frequency, regularity, and proximity test" set forth in Lohrmann v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:40 am
The district court granted the motion because the plaintiff's patents did not qualify as patentable subject matter under the machine-or-transformation, which the United States Supreme Court has recently determine remains a useful test in determining patentable subject matter. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:55 am by Kimberly Alderman
A Maryland federal judge dismissed the ACCG’s test case challenging federal import restrictions as to ancient coins. [read post]
18 May 2011, 7:43 am by The Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and concluded that plaintiff's patents did not satisfy the transformation prong of the machine-or-transformation test under In re Bilski, 130 S. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 1:41 pm by pgbarnes
  Remember the psychological test that claimed to reveal whether an injured plaintiff was really suffering? [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
The court ruled that such concerns were best tested by “[v]igorous cross- examination [and] presentation of contrary evidence,” not by its wholesale preclusion. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 1:17 pm by Mark Tabakman
The Appellate Division reversed, finding that the employer satisfied the ABC test. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:08 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  We say should have known, because if they had done the required safety testing, they would have known. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 12:01 am
dna.jpg No "extraordinary circumstances" were established where the state provided some materials for DNA testing, the testing on the available materials did not exculpate the plaintiff, and an accounting was provided for other materials which had been available at trial but were no longer available, in Bradley v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 5:01 pm by Robin Shea
The judge in this case apparently based his decision on the fact that a white manager (who I don’t believe had anything to do with selections for random drug tests) allegedly made comments about the plaintiff’s “player-mobile” and “pimpmobile. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:28 pm
"I'm a New York attorney who also happens to be French and very annoyed by what's going on," said Pierre Ciric, who is among the plaintiffs saying the prime minister's directive is a burden on French citizens who struggle to get test results in the United States. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am by Steven Eversole
After officers advised her of the implied consent law (which requires drivers to submit to chemical sobriety tests, or else face mandatory license suspension and other penalties), plaintiff submitted to a breathalyzer test. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am by Steven Eversole
After officers advised her of the implied consent law (which requires drivers to submit to chemical sobriety tests, or else face mandatory license suspension and other penalties), plaintiff submitted to a breathalyzer test. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
         The Plaintiff’s interests in an expeditious civil proceeding weighed against the prejudice to the Plaintiff caused by the delay 4. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But it follows that up with this case holding that the more plaintiff-friendly motivating factor test guides the age discrimination law involving federal employees. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit rejected the plaintiff’s attempt to argue that the First Circuit’s “extreme departure” test was the appropriate standard. [read post]