Search for: "Testing Holdings USA, Inc."
Results 501 - 516
of 516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2008, 1:01 pm
Neuro Vasx, Inc., 67 USPQ2d 1205 (TTAB 2003). [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
Teleflex, Inc., 126 S. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners: PharmaStem … [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on the … [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
We hold that the district court applied an inc orrect legal standard in determining Defendant's summary judgment motion. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
Currently, a hodge-podge of methods and devices, some invented more than a century ago, are being used.[9] The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) grants, among other things, money to precincts to update their voting apparatus if in the November 2000 election that apparatus used punch cards or levers. [10] Computerized touch-screen systems called DREs - Direct Recording Electronic voting machines [11] - were a popular choice of many large precincts.[12] Their main competition in the… [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Thus, the Operating Engineers decision that "you can't do this" will inure to the benefit of product manufacturers of all sorts defending against consumer fraud claims - much better than a mere extraterritoriality decision not addressing the merits of the claims would have been.And this holding is ironclad. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:21 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 152 Cal.App.4th 571, 61 Cal.Rptr.3d 344, 346 (Cal.App. 2007). [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:03 am
Syngenta Seeds, Inc., 443 F. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
The Draft would change that, by adopting a "common issues" test focusing on only whether aggregation will "materially advance the disposition of multiple civil claims. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
We AFFIRM 07a0126p.06 2007/04/06 USA v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:08 am
Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
Tobacco Company States Lanham Act Claim Against Online Sellers of 'Grey Market' Cigarettes Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:20 am
We've already posted a number of items about Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Altadis USA, Inc. v. [read post]
