Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Brown"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2017, 7:29 pm
We distinguish the authority of Brown v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 1:01 am
Ten years after the landmark Supreme Court decision Brown v Board of Education ruled that schools must be racially integrated, the city had done little to advance integration in the schools. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:39 am
For example, this op ed in the WSJ attempts to challenge the constitutionality of the legal tool that civil rights activists used to dismantle Jim Crow in public schools (via Brown v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:39 am
In Payne v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 9:30 pm
A more restrained decision from the Court could have produced a less divisive regime that provided greater legal protections for people claimed as fugitive slaves. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:22 am
In LaDell Brown v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am
Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
The article exposes how the federal government played a role in extending racial segregation and discrimination by funding segregated schools up to 10 years after the Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
The odds of justice were abysmal if the defendant was Black or Brown. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
See People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:09 pm
Kelly-Brown v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
While defendant complied, Folkerte could see that defendant was attempting to hide a brown wooden cigar box within the backpack. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
See Brown, 356 U.S. at 154, 78 S.Ct. 622; see also Presser v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Applying Mathews v Eldrige’s deprivation of rights analysis, Judge Brown considered the likelihood of erroneous deprivation. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:35 pm
It's true that it's hard to hire people when you only hire people who are currently employed at jobs that make $X a year -- and often have living and mortgage obligations accordingly -- when your offer is to pay them $X/2. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 7:36 am
People v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 5:21 am
People v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:00 am
" Montejo v. [read post]
