Search for: "The People v. David C." Results 501 - 520 of 1,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:19 am
” “The case is a setback in Pandit’s vision of delivering financial services with a higher sense of responsibility to customers,” said David Knutson, a credit analyst with Legal & General Investment Management in Chicago. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:17 am by David Post
 I understand the campaign’s desire to have some agreement in place prior to allowing people to work on a campaign, and to require volunteers or others to assent to the terms before allowing people to join up. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Strange that I’m made archival, and it won’t sell b/c people have tech in their hands that makes it look decrepit. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Roberts, the author of the notorious 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
These scams include embedded cyberattacks that “steal people’s personal data, peddle dodgy financial investments or break into bank accounts. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:09 am by Kiran Bhat
At the Huffington Post, David Coleman argues that this Term’s decisions, especially Wal-Mart v. [read post]