Search for: "The People v. Officer"
Results 501 - 520
of 22,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
In Corbyn v Millett [2021] EWCA Civ 657, the Court of Appeal provided useful commentary on the issue of ‘bare comment’. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
The case is the most significant elections matter the justices have been forced to confront since the Bush v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:25 pm
Pearson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:35 am
” J.D. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
The clause was created in reference to a real Civil War in which over 750,000 people died in combat. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
The officers totally recognize the defendant as the one driving the vehicle during the pursuit, but when they get to the crashed car, he's nowhere to be found. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
At issue is the meaning of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, which bars people from holding office if they participated in an insurrection after having sworn to uphold the Constitution as an "officer of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:59 am
Here is the complaint: Carano v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:19 pm
D.P. and B.P v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
An excerpt from today's Appellate Court of Connecticut decision in Ambrose v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
He makes a similar inference (at 61) from the silence of most people on the issue of self-execution. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
Juliana v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]