Search for: "The People v. Post"
Results 501 - 520
of 32,762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm
The fear of a retaliatory prosecution is no illusion: The authors examine a recent Texas case, Villarreal v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:23 pm
The 2012 Supreme Court decision in Freeman v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
Congress to the chambers of the European Parliament and the pages of the Washington Post, Kara-Murza’s name became synonymous with the struggle for Russian democracy. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
In Law Society of Ontario v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
The Regulation Platform creates and consumes key discursive tropes: “safe, secure and trustworthy;” "people-centered;" "benefit sustainable development;" "digital divide;" "fair, inclusive, responsible and effective data governance;" These are used to develop guard rails (eg here) and group discipline through controlled systems of assessment that reainforce normative collective solidarity to the values encased in these discursive tropes. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:00 am
I've written two other posts about Grants Pass v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:39 am
” (Yes, people call it that. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am
This is the third post in a series highlighting flaws in the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
I'll address these issues in another post. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:24 am
” Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
”In addition, “[M]any, many more proposals [have been] made outside of Congress, by everyone from political parties to activist organizations and people posting petitions on Change.org. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 1:27 pm
Stolberg); shaking, restraining or beating a child; throwing rocks at a truck (People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
I alluded to this point in my post about why the Chief Justice wrote such a sweeping opinion. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:42 am
Susan V. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
Timson first contacted Evans for help during the Government’s appeal against her successful Judicial Review of the Department for Work and Pensions authorisation of water and energy companies taking money from people’s benefit payments. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Trump v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:31 am
In 2019, the Kansas Supreme Court ruled in Hodes & Nauser v Schmidt that the Kansas Constitution protects a fundamental right to personal autonomy, which includes the right to decide whether to continue a pregnancy. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:06 am
Trump v. [read post]
