Search for: "The People v. Wright"
Results 501 - 520
of 756
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
It “would allow people to collect damages from someone who photographs them in an offensive way during their personal or family time“, reports AP (at Politico). [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
What the original draftsmen (that is, the people who actually wrote the words) subjectively intended might be evidence of what the words meant at the time, but any divergence between the drafters’ subjective intentions and the most likely understandings of those words at the time of enactment would be resolved in favor of the latter. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
(Compare Constantine V. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm
James Cannell argued that under the test established in Boumediene v. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 6:40 pm
Wright. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:35 pm
” People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
July 17, 2012) [Eric's Note: Sam Bayard is an associate at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in New York. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
Political Backing v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:22 am
Context Does Matter People often describe online comments as having the same exposure as an employee shouting out comments in the hallways of the workplace. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:47 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 10:39 am
Wright, Grego & Gronlund, THE PHYSICS OF SPACE SECURITY 33-34 (Cambridge, American Acadamy of Arts and Sciences 2005) 4 Katz v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Wright v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:39 am
Other laboratory tests v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:25 am
So when the plaintiffs in Jones v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:45 am
The Bad: Too many people selling, not enough people buying. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
That case is R. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
See generally Wright v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 2:47 pm
the court has no discretion; concurrent sentences are mandated' " (People v Roundtree, 75 AD3d 1136, 1138, lv denied 15 NY3d 855, quoting People v Hamilton, 4 NY3d 654, 658; see People v Cromwell, 71 AD3d 414, 415, lv denied 15 NY3d 803; People v Mercer, 66 AD3d 1368, 1370, lv denied 13 NY3d 940). [read post]