Search for: "U. S. v. Block" Results 501 - 520 of 653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
It contains, among other things, articles on (i) the US Supreme Court’s damages analysis in Lucent v Microsoft from an economist’s perspective which proposes new guidelines for evaluating patent damages in concentrated, high tech industries and (ii) the evolution of quilts from utility items to works of art proposing strong copyright law protection for quilt designs. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
" Naturally, nothing in our reading would itself prohibit platforms from blocking material. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
Also in the US, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that watchmaker Omega's attempt to use copyright laws to block the sale of Omega watches at discounted prices by Costco will just not work - because of the 'first sale' doctrine' - and that Omega's action was also a misuse of copyright. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:33 am by Jeff Marshall
  Update: On February 22, 2012, the US Supreme Court vacated the lower court's decision in Toby Douglas v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  As the UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency warned advertisers, “By incorporating advertising from recognized brands the website administrator attempt[s] to make the site appear legitimate. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 20 March 2024, Steyn J handed down judgement in the defendant’s application to strike out the claim in the case of Bridgen v Hancock [2024] EWHC 623 (KB). [read post]
7 May 2017, 4:27 pm by Lyle Denniston
Al-Nashiri’s main claim is that the commission has no authority over him because the U,S. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
App. 2018) (an armed robber inadvertently left his phone in victim’s car, thereby abandoning it, citing Edwards v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
If he does, should the committee’s legislative purpose be scrutinized under the exacting criteria established by the Supreme Court in the 2020 Trump v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:31 am by Kellie McTammany
In a June 2018 court brief, Justice Department officials contended that once the insurance mandate’s penalty is gone, the ACA’s consumer protections, such as its ban on charging more or refusing to cover people with pre-existing medical conditions, would be invalidated. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:09 am by Jeralyn
What excuse will the trial court use to block it? [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The House of Representatives has voted to block legislation enacted under President Obama which was designed to give consumers more control over how internet service providers share their data. [read post]